2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (172 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 695 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (279 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Grand Voyager | Outlander |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 2374 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 279 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2165 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 59 L |