2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 995 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager has automatic transmission and 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo has manual transmission. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Grand Voyager | Dingo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2165 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2450 mm |