2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1160 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (93 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Grand Voyager | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |