2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1075 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Grand Voyager | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1149 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 360 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.9 seconds | 13 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |