2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2012 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2012 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher.
Because 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Toyota RAV4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2012 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Grand Voyager | RAV4 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Electric |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |