2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac SRX (304 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 460 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac SRX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac SRX. (359 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac SRX. 2013 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager has manual transmission. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
Model | Grand Voyager | SRX |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 359 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 11.5 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.9 seconds | 9.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 2520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 80 L |