2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Renault Helem. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Renault Helem would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 396 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 209 kg more than 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 Renault Helem is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Renault Helem. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser (157 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 1997 Renault Helem | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | PT Cruiser | Helem |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2975 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 510 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1441 kg | 1650 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 80 L |