2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (114 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser weights approximately 233 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser has manual transmission. 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | PT Cruiser | Equator |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1441 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3260 mm |
