2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser weights approximately 154 kg more than 2011 Volvo C30.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (214 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | PT Cruiser | C30 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 214 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |