2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 1971 Chrysler Charger
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Chrysler Charger (227 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Because 1971 Chrysler Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Chrysler Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Chrysler Charger (461 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 1971 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 1971 Chrysler Charger | |
Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
Model | PT Dream Cruiser | Charger |
Year Released | 2009 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 5211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 227 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 461 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 84.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1890 mm |