2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 1992 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser (178 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1992 Ford Aerostar. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Aerostar.
Because 1992 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Aerostar (224 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 1992 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | PT Dream Cruiser | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2397 cc | 2977 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 143 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 78.7 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1830 mm |
