2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 1995 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser (178 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1995 Ford Aerostar. (134 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Aerostar.
Because 1995 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 1995 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | PT Dream Cruiser | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 134 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 217 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1830 mm |