2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 2004 Ford Focus
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Focus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Focus would be higher. At 2,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser (178 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2004 Ford Focus. (171 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Focus.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser (210 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Focus. (197 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Focus.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 2004 Ford Focus | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | PT Dream Cruiser | Focus |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 171 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 197 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |