2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo C70 (190 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo C70 (285 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | PT Dream Cruiser | C70 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 285 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |