2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 2005 Ford Escape
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Escape. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Escape would be higher. At 2,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser (178 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2005 Ford Escape. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Escape.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser (210 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Escape. (206 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Escape.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 2005 Ford Escape | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | PT Dream Cruiser | Escape |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 2302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 206 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 94 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |