2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 2006 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercury Mariner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercury Mariner would be higher. At 2,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser (178 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2006 Mercury Mariner. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercury Mariner.
Because 2006 Mercury Mariner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Mariner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser (210 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercury Mariner. (206 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercury Mariner.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 2006 Mercury Mariner | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
| Model | PT Dream Cruiser | Mariner |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2397 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 94 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1790 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
