2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 2006 Volvo S80
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Volvo S80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Volvo S80 would be higher. At 2,520 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S80 (207 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo S80 (320 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2006 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 2006 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | PT Dream Cruiser | S80 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 2520 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 207 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 93.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1840 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |