2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 2007 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Volvo XC70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Volvo XC70 would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2007 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Volvo XC70 (209 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Because 2007 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Volvo XC70 (320 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2007 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 2007 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | PT Dream Cruiser | XC70 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2397 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 209 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 93 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1870 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
