2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 2009 Chrysler Aspen
To start off, both 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser and 2009 Chrysler Aspen were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP) has 121 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chrysler Aspen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (330 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 2009 Chrysler Aspen | |
Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
Model | PT Dream Cruiser | Aspen |
Year Released | 2009 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 299 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1940 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |