2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 2009 Ford Falcon
To start off, both 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser and 2009 Ford Falcon were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Falcon (261 HP) has 83 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Because 2009 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Falcon (391 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 2009 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | PT Dream Cruiser | Falcon |
Year Released | 2009 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 391 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 99.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1868 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13 L/100km |