2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 2012 Acura TL
To start off, 2012 Acura TL is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Acura TL (305 HP) has 127 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Because 2012 Acura TL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Acura TL (370 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2012 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 2012 Acura TL | |
| Make | Chrysler | Acura |
| Model | PT Dream Cruiser | TL |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2397 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 305 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 370 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1880 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
