2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser would be higher. At 2,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser (178 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser (210 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | PT Dream Cruiser | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2397 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 132 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1765 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
