2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP) has 88 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
Model | PT Dream Cruiser | CTS |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 266 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 302 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1842 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13 L/100km |