2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 2013 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chrysler 300 (358 HP) has 180 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Because 2013 Chrysler 300 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chrysler 300 (534 Nm) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2013 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 2013 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
| Model | PT Dream Cruiser | 300 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2397 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 358 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 534 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1902 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |
