2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 2013 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2013 Ford Explorer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Explorer (286 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Because 2013 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Explorer (346 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 2013 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | PT Dream Cruiser | Explorer |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 286 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 346 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2291 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |