2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser vs. 2013 Mazda 6
To start off, 2013 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser (178 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 6. (168 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 6 (226 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2013 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser has automatic transmission and 2013 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2013 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | 2013 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | PT Dream Cruiser | 6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 168 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 226 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |