2009 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1951 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1951 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Sebring | 1951 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Sebring | XK |
Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2736 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2600 mm |