2009 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1962 DAF 750
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Sebring (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 1158 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Sebring (256 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Sebring | 1962 DAF 750 | |
| Make | Chrysler | DAF |
| Model | Sebring | 750 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2736 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 31 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 256 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 85.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 7.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 662 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2060 mm |
