2009 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Sebring (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (38 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Because 1968 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Sebring (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (72 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Sebring | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Chrysler | ZAZ |
Model | Sebring | 966 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 72 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2170 mm |