2009 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 268 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Sebring | 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Sebring | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1968 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 2118 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 107 L |
