2009 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Sebring (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 1103 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Sebring (220 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Sebring | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Chrysler | Zastava |
Model | Sebring | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1873 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2160 mm |