2009 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2001 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Hyundai Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Hyundai Matrix would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Sebring (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2001 Hyundai Matrix. (104 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2001 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 643 kg more than 2001 Hyundai Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Sebring (220 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Hyundai Matrix. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Hyundai Matrix. 2009 Chrysler Sebring has automatic transmission and 2001 Hyundai Matrix has manual transmission. 2001 Hyundai Matrix will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chrysler Sebring will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Sebring | 2001 Hyundai Matrix | |
Make | Chrysler | Hyundai |
Model | Sebring | Matrix |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 97 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1873 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 72 L |