2009 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2004 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Sebring (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B3000. (155 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 120 kg more than 2004 Mazda B3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Sebring. (166 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Sebring | 2004 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Sebring | B3000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 244 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 74 L |