2009 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2005 Ford E-150
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Sebring. (139 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 828 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Sebring. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Sebring. (189 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Sebring | 2005 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | E-150 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 189 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 2383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 132 L |