2009 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Sebring (173 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Sebring (225 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Sebring | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Sebring | 6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 225 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 55 L |