2009 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler Sebring would be higher.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Sebring | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Sebring | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 2.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 1.9 L/100km |
