2009 Chrysler Town & Country vs. 1995 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Town & Country is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Aerostar would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Town & Country weights approximately 520 kg more than 1995 Ford Aerostar.
Because 1995 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Town & Country, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Town & Country | 1995 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Town & Country | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2035 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3030 mm |
