2009 Chrysler Town & Country vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Town & Country is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 465 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Town & Country.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chrysler Town & Country. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Town & Country | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | Town & Country | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 176 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2035 kg | 2500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 100 L |
