2009 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1963 Isuzu Bellel

To start off, 2009 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Voyager (141 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 708 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Voyager (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chrysler Voyager 1963 Isuzu Bellel
Make Chrysler Isuzu
Model Voyager Bellel
Year Released 2009 1963
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2499 cc 1991 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 141 HP 55 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 121 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2200 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 8.7:1
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 2040 kg 1332 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2540 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]