2009 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2004 MCC Silverpulse
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Silverpulse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Silverpulse would be higher. At 2,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 MCC Silverpulse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Silverpulse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Voyager | 2004 MCC Silverpulse | |
| Make | Chrysler | MCC |
| Model | Voyager | Silverpulse |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2768 cc | 699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
