2009 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Voyager. (173 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 68 kg more than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Voyager. (278 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Voyager | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | Voyager | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 4013 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 278 Nm | 344 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1985 kg | 1917 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 85 L |