2009 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Voyager. (173 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Voyager. (278 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Voyager | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Voyager | XF |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 278 Nm | 450 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |