2009 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 1992 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo. 1992 Ford Tempo has automatic transmission and 2009 Citroen C-Crosser has manual transmission. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Ford Tempo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C-Crosser | 1992 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C-Crosser | Tempo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 93.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |