2009 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 2010 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Citroen C-Crosser would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 5008. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 5008.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Peugeot 5008. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 5008. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 5008.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | 2010 Peugeot 5008 | |
| Make | Citroen | Peugeot |
| Model | C-Crosser | 5008 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2359 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 232 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
