2009 Citroen C1 vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2009 Citroen C1 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C1 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C1 should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 20 kg more than 2009 Citroen C1.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C1 (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C1 | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Citroen | Riley |
Model | C1 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 25 L |