2009 Citroen C1 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2009 Citroen C1 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 140 kg more than 2009 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Citroen C1 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | C1 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 57 L |
