2009 Citroen C1 vs. 1978 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2009 Citroen C1 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda RX-7 (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C1 weights approximately 412 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-7.
Because 1978 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda RX-7 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C1 | 1978 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C1 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1978 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 996 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 157 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1472 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 65 L |