2009 Citroen C1 vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2009 Citroen C1 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C1 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C1 should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen C1 weights approximately 45 kg more than 1979 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C1 | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C1 | 66 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |