2009 Citroen C1 vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2009 Citroen C1 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,270 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C1 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C1 should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Nissan Pulsar (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1983 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C1 | 1983 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | C1 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2420 mm |