2009 Citroen C1 vs. 1986 Mazda 929
To start off, 2009 Citroen C1 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda 929 (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C1.
Because 1986 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda 929 (230 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Citroen C1 | 1986 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C1 | 929 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2720 mm |